CO129-294 - Governor Sir Blake - 1899 [10-12] — Page 142

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

139

The position of the Company is briefly this.

On 2nd June 1888 Mr A.K. Travers, Assistant Postmaster General, wrote a letter to the then Superintendent of this Company, (as per copy attached to my letter to the Hon. A. M. Thomson of 25th January last) embodying the terms of an Agreement for the conveyance of Mails between China and India; this Agreement has never been cancelled. We further contend, see extract from the instructions from my Directors contained in my letter of 16th November to your predecessor, that if Mails were shipped for a port off the Contract-Line it is no fault of ours if they were not conveyed to destination, as intended, in our steamers, and the Company are consequently entitled to the full Mail money due.

I would, therefore, again submit to your favourable consideration my letter of 16th November last, in which I conveyed to you a proposal made by my Directors that the matter should be adjusted by my refunding to you the amount paid for the conveyance of the Mails to Japan during the same period, which appears to me to be a fair, not to say, liberal concession on the part of this Company.

It would be out of the question for me to recommend my Directors to compound the matter in a manner so obviously disadvantageous

Edit History

2026-05-31 09:07:23 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
139 The position of the Company is briefly this. On 2nd June 1888 Mr A.K. Travers, Assistant Postmaster General, wrote a letter to the then Superintendent of this Company, (as per copy attached to my letter to the Hon. A. M. Thomson of 25th January last) embodying the terms of an Agreement for the conveyance of Mails between China and India; this Agreement has never been cancelled. We further contend, see extract from the instructions from my Directors contained in my letter of 16th November to your predecessor, that if Mails were shipped for a port off the Contract-Line it is no fault of ours if they were not conveyed to destination, as intended, in our steamers, and the Company are consequently entitled to the full Mail money due. I would, therefore, again submit to your favourable consideration my letter of 16th November last, in which I conveyed to you a proposal made by my Directors that the matter should be adjusted by my refunding to you the amount paid for the conveyance of the Mails to Japan during the same period, which appears to me to be a fair, not to say, liberal concession on the part of this Company. It would be out of the question for me to recommend my Directors to compound the matter in a manner so obviously disadvantageous
Baseline (Original)
:' 139 The position of the Company is briefly this. On 2nd. June 1888 Ir.A.K.Travers, Assistant Fostmaster General, wrote a letter to the then Superintendent of this Company,(as per copy attached to my letter to the Hon. A. M. Thomson of 25rd. January last) embodying the terms of an Agreement for the conveyance of Mails between China and India; this Agreement has never been cancelled. We further contend, see extract from the instructions from my Directors contained in my letter of 16th. November to your predecessor, that if lails were shipped for a port off the Contract -- Line it is no fault of ours if they were not conveyed to destination, as intended, in our steamers, and the Company are consequently entitled to the full rail money due. I would, therefore, again submit to your favourable consideration my letter of 16th. November last, in which I conveyed to you a proposal made by my Directors that the matter should be adjusted by my refunding to you the amount paid for the conveyance of the Hails to Japan during the same period,which appears to me to be a fair, not to say,liberal concession on the part of this Company. It would be out of the question for me to recommend my Directors to compound the matter in a manner so obviously disadvantageous
2026-05-31 09:07:23 · Baseline
View content

:'

139

The position of the Company is briefly this.

On 2nd. June 1888 Ir.A.K.Travers, Assistant Fostmaster

General, wrote a letter to the then Superintendent of this

Company,(as per copy attached to my letter to the Hon. A. M.

Thomson of 25rd. January last) embodying the terms of an

Agreement for the conveyance of Mails between China and

India; this Agreement has never been cancelled. We further

contend, see extract from the instructions from my Directors

contained in my letter of 16th. November to your predecessor,

that if lails were shipped for a port off the Contract --

Line it is no fault of ours if they were not conveyed to

destination, as intended, in our steamers, and the Company

are consequently entitled to the full rail money due.

I would, therefore, again submit to your

favourable consideration my letter of 16th. November last,

in which I conveyed to you a proposal made by my Directors

that the matter should be adjusted by my refunding to you

the amount paid for the conveyance of the Hails to Japan

during the same period,which appears to me to be a fair,

not to say,liberal concession on the part of this Company.

It would be out of the question for me to recommend my

Directors to compound the matter in a manner so obviously

disadvantageous

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.